Showing posts with label Creator. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creator. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Coming into the Presence—Elul 4

On Rosh HaShanah we celebrate the creation of the world. On Yom Kippur we stand before the Creator to be judged for the way we have used the life we have been given in the last year. In the ten days between celebration and judgment, life and death, we turn toward the One.

Here’s a fresh way to think about coming into the Presence that sparks in me new ways to think about celebrating the creation of the world, turning to the One, standing before the judgment of the One, living a life of gratitude in the presence of the ever-renewing One. It comes from a Hasidic story recorded by Martin Buber in his book Ecstatic Confessions.
In the earliest morning twilight a tzaddik stood at the window and, trembling, called out, “Just a short time ago it was still night, and now it is day—God is causing the day to arise!” And he was full of fear and trembling. Moreover he said, “Every created being should be ashamed before the Creator. For if he were perfect, as he was destined to be, he would have to be astonished and awaken and catch fire over the renewal of the creature at every time and in every moment.” (p.147)

Sunday, July 22, 2012

We Have Come into Being to Praise--Not to Criticize

We have not come into being to hate or to destroy;
We have come into being to praise, to labor, and to love.
Last week, in talking about the three fundamental actions of being human, to praise, to labor and to love, I focused on praise in relation to the One, the Source and End of All Existence. But, like the other two, labor and love, praise has two directions: toward the One and toward all that is created.

It is not enough to praise the One, That Which Is Without End, That Which is Beautiful, True, and Prefect, the Creating, Judging, Redeeming, and Sanctifying Power. Human existence depends also on praising all that is part of the One, all that flows from and back to the One. Few of us would stand in front of a great painter and criticize her painting. Or in front of a great sculptor and point out all the flaws in his sculpture. Or in front of a weaver and find fault with the pattern or the colors or the looseness or tightness of the weave. Yet that is what we do every day as we go about criticizing friends or family members or strangers—whether their clothes or their bodies or their actions or failures to act or habits or their wishes and dreams—or a landscape or the weather or the food we are served. This isn’t enough that. That isn’t enough this. We find it so easy to find the one flaw in all that is good. We do it out of habit, without thinking, as if it were our right to cast judgment in this way on everyone and everything.

We criticize so often, so carelessly. It seems as if it is nothing. Yet to criticize the works of a great artist is a grave offense. It means we are not acknowledging the good, not appreciating the beauty; we are not being grateful. But there is another deleterious effect we often forget about as we rush to give our opinion. (Our opinion! How consequential our preferences are! How important we are, we who can pass judgment on all things, with our profound knowledge, our wide perspective, our deep experience of the many ways a good life can be lived!). Here is the great harm we do with our careless flinging of judgments: our rush to criticize, our failure to praise, covers what we see with a dark, oily film, which makes it harder for others to see the beauty underneath. And it also makes it hard for that creature we have covered with our criticisms to breathe out all its beauty and goodness; like a seal or a seabird after an oil spill, it begins to die a slow, painful and cruel death, unless someone comes and removes that film of oil.

One of the stories Idries Shah tells in Tales of the Dervishes reveals the ingratitude and harm of criticism. It also points to the foolishness of making judgments of any kind from our limited perspective.
An idiot looked at a browsing camel. He said to it: “Your appearance is awry. Why is this so?”
The camel replied: “In judging the impression made, you are attributing a fault to that which shaped the form. Be aware of this! Do not consider my crooked appearance a fault.
‘Get away from me, by the shortest route. My appearance is thus for function, for a reason. The bow needs the bentness as well as the straightness of the bowstring.
‘Fool, begone! An ass’s perception goes with an ass’s nature.’
The next time you are about to open your mouth to criticize, remember the talking camel.

Try to go for a day, just one day, without criticizing anything, another human being, yourself, your life, the world around you. It’s a hard, hard habit to break. Our little selves, our false egos love this game. It makes us feel so superior. But try. And instead of looking for fault, just look at all that exists, look without judgment or expectation or preference, look with deep acceptance of and appreciation for what it is, for what is. And give thanks for it.

That would be a day of praise.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

No Easy Answers Either—Discernment Is the Way

The path is rugged and the traveler is weak, says Ghazali in The Path of the Worshipful Servant to the Garden of the Lord of All Worlds. How then do we make the journey? With this single provision—“worshipful obedience.”

Aha! say some religious folks. Good! Tell me the rules, tell me what I must do, that I may obey them and reach the destination.

Aha! say the rationalists. Terrible. This is what faith always comes down to—blind obedience.

Aha! Say I. Ghazali means something completely different. In describing “worshipful obedience” in this first chapter on sustenance, he refuses to give a set of rules than can be applied by the faithful or sneered at by the enlightened. Instead, he presents a view of worshipful obedience along the path as something akin to discernment of the heart.

We are to trust absolutely only in the Creator to provide our sustenance, he says. What does that mean in our lives?

Is the person who does not take along provisions for his or her journey the pious person, then?

Or is the person who takes along his or her own sustenance on the journey the pious one?

The answer to both questions is: Sometimes. Depending on the state of the traveler’s heart, whether it is truly free or it is attached to the provisions.

A person who takes nothing into the desert on a pilgrimage, professing to depend absolutely for all provisions on the Creator, may deep in the heart be attached to those provision left behind. And person who takes nothing along and then whines and begs provisions from fellow travelers would have done better to take their own provisions. There are some, however, who set out with no provisions, completely detached and wholly dependent on the Creator.

A person who takes many provisions on a pilgrimage may be taking them along without any attachment to them, with complete dependence on the Creator to provide. They may be taking the provisions instance, so they will be available to whomever on the journey needs them, according to God’s plan of provision.

It is not simply the act itself, but the heart out of which the action arises that describes “worshipful obedience.” In each case, discernment is the key. Each person must discern for himself or herself where they are in the journey and whether they are to take provisions or not at a particular moment. It is not whether or not they carry provisions with them that matters; it is how complete their trust in the Creator is. Their discernment may lead them to take provisions at some points, and leave them behind at others. There is no absolute rule of action to follow at all times, only the rule of what is required of the purely trusting heart in a given situation.

That is part of what makes the path so difficult: it requires constant discernment of what is required of one in this moment, in this place along the way.

Discernment is a spiritual muscle cultivated not only by Ghazali and other Sufis, but by the Hasids and Christian mystics as well, as we’ll see in a later post.